Class and Interaction Diagrams specifications
The Modelling TC participants have initially identified two area for developing detailed specifications These specifications and the individuals who have volunteered to work on these areas are as follows:
- Class Diagram Superstructure Metamodel ( Jim Odell, Renato Levy, Marc-Philippe Huget, Misty Nodine, )
Initial version <doc 137KB> 03-10-31
Revised version from London and interim meetings <doc 137KB> 04-01-21
Response from Radovan Cervenka <doc 200KB> 04-03-10 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Class Diagrams (Marc-Philippe Huget, Bernhard Bauer, Jim Odell, Renato Levy, Paola Turci, Radovan Cervenka, Misty Nodine, Stephen Cranefield, and Hong Zhu)
Initial version <doc 144KB> 03-04-27
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed metamodel from Hong Zhu <doc 80KB> revised 03-06-30
- Interaction Diagrams (Marc-Philippe Huget, Bernhard Bauer, Jim Odell, Renato Levy, Paola Turci, Radovan Cervenka, and Hong Zhu)
Revised version <pdf 833KB><doc 546KB> 03-07-02
(The OMG UML 2.0 Interactions Diagram chapter can be downloaded as well <zipped PDF 550KB>)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Response from Mellouli Sehl <doc 317KB> 03-03-09
Response from Marc-Philippe Huget <doc 317KB> 03-03-09
Response from Jim Odell <doc 26KB> 03-03-09
Response from Michael Winikoff<doc 27KB> 03-03-09
Response from Marc-Philippe Huget to Michael Winikoff <doc 27KB> 03-03-10
Response from Michael Winikoff to Marc-Philippe Huget <doc 27KB> 03-03-10
Response from Renato Levy <doc 27KB> 03-03-10
Response from Hong Zhu <doc 24KB> 03-03-11
Response from Paola Turci <doc 20KB> 03-03-11
Response from Lin Padgham <doc 41KB> 03-03-16
Response from Stephen Cranefield <doc 363KB> 03-03-17
Response from Misty Nodine <doc 44KB> 03-03-20
- Interaction Diagram Case Study- Case Study of Agent-Oriented Modeling using the UN Security Council's Procedure to Issue Resolutions. The purpose is to see how other methods and notations would model this case, including UML and other notation sources. Participants are invited to provide modeling solutions for this case study. Please send responses for posting to Jim Odell.
Revised case study description <doc 22KB> 03-03-22 09:32EST
Response from Renato Levy <doc 83KB> 03-03-21 16:32EST
Response #2 from Renato Levy <doc 112KB> 03-03-25 15:00EST
Response from Radovan Cervenka <doc 200KB> 03-03-31 07:01EST
Response from Hong Zhu <doc 93KB><pdf 195KB> 03-04-04 03:24EST
Response from Misty Nodine <doc 560KB> 03-04-15 16:48EST
Modeling Areas
Modeling Notation Sources
The Modelling TC participants have initially identified sources of notations that should be considered for a FIPA AUML. Those documents without download links are yet to be produced.
- UML 2.0 (Jim Odell) <pdf 62KB><doc 154KB> 03-03-01
- AOR (Jim Odell) <pdf 223KB><doc 271KB> 03-03-01
- PASSI (Massimo Cossentino) <pdf 1187KB><doc 289KB> 03-04-29
- MESSAGE (Radovan Cervenka) <pdf 146KB><doc 240KB> 03-03-12
- Tropos (includes i* and GRL) (Radovan Cervenka) <pdf 116KB><doc 115KB> 03-03-12
- ADELFE (Marc-Philippe Huget) <pdf 146KB><doc 240KB> 03-03-13
- Gaia (Alfredo Garro) <pdf 215KB><doc 274KB> 03-03-12
- BRIC (Jim Odell) <pdf 140KB><doc 570KB> 03-02-27
- Styx (Radovan Cervenka) <pdf 121KB><doc 67KB> 03-03-12
- Prometheus (Radovan Cervenka) <pdf 236KB><doc 302KB> 03-04-02 revised version
- MADkit (Renato Levy) <pdf 207KB><doc 234KB> 03-03-12
- OPM (Marc-Philippe Huget, Iris Reinhartz-Berger, Dov Dori, Onn Shehory, Arnon Sturm)
<pdf 538KB><doc 1221KB> 03-03-14
For more information on which documents are scheduled to appear here, see Projects.
For a schedule of these document, see Schedule & Events.